What's a CCD bakeout, anyway?

[The EIT CCD detector] What's a CCD bakeout, anyway?

Can't get your EITV? Read on, to understand why we have to take EIT off the air from time to time....

What's a CCD?

The detector in the Extreme ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT) on the SOHO spacecraft is a backside-thinned charge-coupled detector (CCD). The EIT CCD (above) is similar to the frontside CCD's handheld video cameras, but with better read noise (the "snow" or "fuzz" you see in your home videos when there's little available light) and, thanks to the backside-thinning, it's sensitive to extreme ultraviolet (EUV) light.

What's a bakeout?

In order to (i) keep read noise down (suppress the "snow") and (ii) prevent cosmic ray hits from permanently raising the read noise level by damaging the detector, the EIT CCD is usually operated at a temperature of about -67 C. This temperature is achieved by passive cooling: the CCD chip is thermally contacted to a titanium "cold finger" (at far left in the image above) that is attached to a radiator plate that is pointed at a piece of sky perpendicular to the earth-Sun line.

Unfortunately, there's a small amount of "slush," probably a mixture of water vapor and hydrocarbons, that avoided the initial bakeout (just after launch) of the instrument. The back end of the EIT telescope, unfortunately, is a difficult place from which to escape, because of the plate holding the final, thin aluminum filter just in front of the CCD, and a labyrinthine venting system (designed to prevent stray light). At -67 C, even with the low partial pressure in space, the slush condenses on the CCD and the cold finger --- they're the coldest parts of the back end of the instrument. The slush absorbs some EUV, and so reduces the throughput of the instrument.

In addition, overexposure to EUV (say, from bright flares or --- before the onboard software was fixed to prevent this --- accidentally long exposures) can produce electron traps in the CCD material, which reduce the detector's throughput (how many electrons it produces for a given number of photons striking a pixel). Thus, we need to warm up --- "bake out" --- the detector to evaporate the slush (if only temporarily) and anneal out the traps in order to maintain the performance of the instrument.

How long do I have to wait for new EIT images?

We bake out the CCD by turning on small electric heaters on the CCD camera. This raises the CCD temperature to ~ +16 C. We do so every ~ 3 months, during SOHO telemetry keyholes, for 2 - 4 weeks; we also run detector efficiency tests before and after the bakeout. If nothing else, it gives our crack operations team some much-needed time off now and then.

See the bottom of the EIT bakeout history for an estimate of how long the current bakeout will last.

So please be patient, and we'll be back with more EUV solar images soon.

Update: After the SOHO Recovery

For nearly three months in the summer of 1998, while the SOHO spacecraft rolled out of control, its batteries discharged and its solar panels pointing uselessly edge-on to the Sun, the radiator which normally carries heat away from the EIT CCD to the cold of space was pointed right at the Sun. According to the best thermal models available, this raised the temperature of the EIT CCD to over +35 C. Tests after the recovery of the spacecraft in 1998 September showed that not only had the CCD regained much of its lost sensitivity (~ 60%), but the "slush" appeared to have gone away --- for good. The CCD experts on the EIT team suspect that the slush began to escape when the rear thin aluminum filter peeled slightly from its frame in 1998 February. We will still need to bake out from time to time to cure the electron traps, however.

Another Update: Keyholes

The mechanism that allowed the spacecraft's high-gain antenna (HGA) to track the earth's apparent east-west motion as seen from SOHO failed in 2003 May. The only way to move the antenna thereafter involved direct ground commands that activated primary and redundant motor windings in quick succession. Fortunately, the HGA beam pattern is broader than expected, and by using that method to drive the antenna to a "sweet spot" we can continue to obtain scientific telemetry throughout nearly half of each six-month orbit about L1 - only in a relatively short "keyhole" about the time when SOHO is closest to the earth-Sun line do we need 34- or 70-m Deep Space Network (DSN) antenna support to receive telemetry through our low-gain, more or less omnidirectional antenna instead. Unfortunately, the current press of deep-space missions supported by those antennas means we generally lose up to half of the data we could be taking during keyholes, and we have very little real-time contact in which to insure the health and operational safety of the instrument.

So, making a virtue of necessity, we use the keyholes for extended (11 - 21 day) bakeouts. Since starting bakeouts during keyholes, we've noticed that the additional bakeout time appears to lead to a small but noticeable, net gain of some of the lost throughput, bakeout after bakeout. Presumably, the longer bakeouts simply cure more electron traps.

Update to the Update: Shorter Bakeouts

Since the instrument Principal Investigator believes we are not obtaining any benefit from bakeouts longer than a few days, most of our current (2007 and later) keyhole bakeouts are less than a week long.

Web curator: Joseph B. Gurman
Responsible NASA official: Joseph B. Gurman, Facility Scientist, Solar Data Analysis Center
[e-mail address: joseph<dot>b<dot>gurman<at>nasa<dot>gov]
+1 301 286-4767

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Solar Physics Branch / Code 682
Greenbelt, MD 20771

Last revised - J.B. Gurman